Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23141 - 23150 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 23141 - 23150 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concentration, and operating after revocation. ¶3 Prior to trial, Sexton, through his attorney, stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
concentration, and operating after revocation. ¶3 Prior to trial, Sexton, through his attorney, stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71225 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
for postconviction relief. He alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to claim trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144242 - 2015-07-06
Chevron Chemical Company v. Deloitte & Touche LLP
the damages on the basis of the trial record, with additional briefing and oral argument. The court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16960 - 2005-03-31
the damages on the basis of the trial record, with additional briefing and oral argument. The court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to investigate potential witnesses, and that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290695 - 2020-09-24
that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to investigate potential witnesses, and that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290695 - 2020-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
county. The motion was denied. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Neither Gomez nor Arenas testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109567 - 2014-05-04
county. The motion was denied. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Neither Gomez nor Arenas testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109567 - 2014-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
order. The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39560 - 2009-08-17
order. The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39560 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Bruce N. Brown
in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), which gives trial courts a broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), which gives trial courts a broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
Salbashian appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment, thereby dismissing his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2744 - 2005-03-31
Salbashian appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment, thereby dismissing his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2744 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Nuttleman
of their motor vehicles, as required by § 346.61, Stats.; and (2) the trial judge improperly testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13102 - 2005-03-31
of their motor vehicles, as required by § 346.61, Stats.; and (2) the trial judge improperly testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13102 - 2005-03-31
State v. David R. Messner
contends that trial counsel[1] was ineffective in the burglary case for not seeking dismissal relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31
contends that trial counsel[1] was ineffective in the burglary case for not seeking dismissal relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31