Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23151 - 23160 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 23151 - 23160 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Sean Fitzgerald Rowell
, and 939.62, Stats. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14006 - 2005-03-31
, and 939.62, Stats. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. Claudio alleges that his appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32546 - 2014-09-15
motion. Claudio alleges that his appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32546 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime. He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Gutierrez argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
to a crime. He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Gutierrez argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397478 - 2021-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2009-10)[1] and from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71317 - 2011-09-27
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2009-10)[1] and from an order denying his motion to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71317 - 2011-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785841 - 2024-04-09
State v. Glenn Turner
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Turner
(1991-92), 1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
(1991-92), 1 and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7227 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144224 - 2015-07-08
publicly reprimanded and motion denied. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144224 - 2015-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bryan Bagstad appeals an order that denied Bagstad’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bryan Bagstad appeals an order that denied Bagstad’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687523 - 2023-08-10