Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23151 - 23160 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 23151 - 23160 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
State v. Paula Oltrogge
in Hansford that Wis. Stat. § 756.096(3)(am), 1995-96, which mandated that “[a] jury in misdemeanor cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15423 - 2005-03-31
in Hansford that Wis. Stat. § 756.096(3)(am), 1995-96, which mandated that “[a] jury in misdemeanor cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15423 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
he had worked on other cases.4 He asked her whether Schubert’s injuries could have been caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27895 - 2014-09-15
he had worked on other cases.4 He asked her whether Schubert’s injuries could have been caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dean H. Cutsforth
of evidence. Id. ¶18 Cutsforth argues that the police in his case were not in hot pursuit because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
of evidence. Id. ¶18 Cutsforth argues that the police in his case were not in hot pursuit because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
petitioned to remove the case to federal court on March 30, and filed its answer there. After Parker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
petitioned to remove the case to federal court on March 30, and filed its answer there. After Parker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21
James Ronald Gaddis v. La Crosse Products, Inc.
and that there is no prejudice in this case, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals. The procedural facts giving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16934 - 2005-03-31
and that there is no prejudice in this case, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals. The procedural facts giving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16934 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rufus Davis
). In this case, the transcript of the closing arguments is before us and there is no dispute as to what was said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
). In this case, the transcript of the closing arguments is before us and there is no dispute as to what was said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evaluation. Yvette’s attorney indicated that she could not proceed with the case without Yvette present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
evaluation. Yvette’s attorney indicated that she could not proceed with the case without Yvette present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 180
2009 WI App 180 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP460-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44050 - 2011-02-07
2009 WI App 180 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP460-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44050 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
WI APP 88
2013 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1808-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1808-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
2002 WI App 201 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2167 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 201 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2167 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31