Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23161 - 23170 of 68754 for had.
Search results 23161 - 23170 of 68754 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Kelsey C.R.
questions. After Kelsey had responded to a few questions, the police told her to "stay put." Kelsey
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17571 - 2017-09-21
questions. After Kelsey had responded to a few questions, the police told her to "stay put." Kelsey
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 82
the beginning because the warrant had no basis in fact or law. The State contends that suppression
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52198 - 2014-09-15
the beginning because the warrant had no basis in fact or law. The State contends that suppression
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52198 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Phonesavanh Vanmanivong
on the basis that the circuit court had erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to follow
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16449 - 2017-09-21
on the basis that the circuit court had erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to follow
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16449 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael S. Piddington
of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order which had suppressed the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31
of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order which had suppressed the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31
Hoida, Inc. v. M&I Midstate Bank
had invoiced Packard for $5,705 of its work. The invoices required payment within 15 days. On March
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25525 - 2006-06-12
had invoiced Packard for $5,705 of its work. The invoices required payment within 15 days. On March
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25525 - 2006-06-12
[PDF]
WI App 28
had been deprived of his “constitutional right to a speedy trial” and his “14th Amendment right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793088 - 2024-06-20
had been deprived of his “constitutional right to a speedy trial” and his “14th Amendment right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793088 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
WI APP 101
of immunity for state employees. The plaintiffs contend Fox is not immune because (1) he had a ministerial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33182 - 2014-09-15
of immunity for state employees. The plaintiffs contend Fox is not immune because (1) he had a ministerial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33182 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
-0926-CR 5 autopsy suggested that Thomas had died of asphyxiation and had probably been choked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
-0926-CR 5 autopsy suggested that Thomas had died of asphyxiation and had probably been choked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
had stopped her; and then he took her driver's license back to his squad car. Though Rennie testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33358 - 2008-07-08
had stopped her; and then he took her driver's license back to his squad car. Though Rennie testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33358 - 2008-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
for state employees. The plaintiffs contend Fox is not immune because (1) he had a ministerial duty under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33182 - 2011-06-14
for state employees. The plaintiffs contend Fox is not immune because (1) he had a ministerial duty under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33182 - 2011-06-14