Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23171 - 23180 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23171 - 23180 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
State v. Robert H. Miller
drawn. Id. at 771. Miller argues that by claiming to be a Jehovah’s Witness, he put himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5742 - 2005-03-31
drawn. Id. at 771. Miller argues that by claiming to be a Jehovah’s Witness, he put himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
A no-contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15
A no-contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Danny R. Peterson v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
concluded that Peterson’s claim is barred by Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute, WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16203 - 2017-09-21
concluded that Peterson’s claim is barred by Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute, WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16203 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 124
agree and remand for entry of a judgment of acquittal on one obstruction charge. Schultz claims his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53280 - 2014-09-15
agree and remand for entry of a judgment of acquittal on one obstruction charge. Schultz claims his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Syed Hasan Turab
. Turab claims that the trial court erred in several respects. First, he argues a due process violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10084 - 2017-09-19
. Turab claims that the trial court erred in several respects. First, he argues a due process violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Shirley Yvonne Robinson v. Gordon Charles Robinson
in the computation of the marital estate. Shirley cross-appeals, claiming that maintenance should have been held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3296 - 2017-09-19
in the computation of the marital estate. Shirley cross-appeals, claiming that maintenance should have been held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3296 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carolyn G.
terminating their parental rights. Carolyn claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5012 - 2017-09-19
terminating their parental rights. Carolyn claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5012 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. Darden claims that his No. 2011AP883-CR 2 trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81988 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motions. Darden claims that his No. 2011AP883-CR 2 trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81988 - 2014-09-15
State v. Demetrius Newman
and 941.28, Stats.[1] Newman claims: (1) the trial court erred when it took judicial notice of co-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
and 941.28, Stats.[1] Newman claims: (1) the trial court erred when it took judicial notice of co-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
denying his postconviction motion. He claims: (1) WIS. STAT. § 948.07 is unconstitutional because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
denying his postconviction motion. He claims: (1) WIS. STAT. § 948.07 is unconstitutional because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19