Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23181 - 23190 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23181 - 23190 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love, 284 Wis. 2d 111, ¶26. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love, 284 Wis. 2d 111, ¶26. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sarah R.P.
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Foist Johnson
denial of a Machner hearing de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19
denial of a Machner hearing de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 67
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95548 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95548 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
695, 809 N.W.2d 37. We review de novo whether the elements of judicial estoppel are present because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583072 - 2022-11-02
695, 809 N.W.2d 37. We review de novo whether the elements of judicial estoppel are present because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583072 - 2022-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 Tudor contends that this court should review the circuit court’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638845 - 2023-03-29
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 Tudor contends that this court should review the circuit court’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638845 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The City requested a de novo trial pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 800.14(4). Young moved to dismiss, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346287 - 2021-03-17
. The City requested a de novo trial pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 800.14(4). Young moved to dismiss, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346287 - 2021-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶32, 301 Wis. 2d 642, 734 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372620 - 2021-06-02
are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI 78, ¶32, 301 Wis. 2d 642, 734 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372620 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
WI App 6
determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional requirement for voluntary consent. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57894 - 2014-09-15
determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional requirement for voluntary consent. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 6
, which presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Gold v. City of Adams, 2002 WI App 45, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27353 - 2014-09-15
, which presents a question of law we decide de novo. See Gold v. City of Adams, 2002 WI App 45, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27353 - 2014-09-15