Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23181 - 23190 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
interpretation presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16966 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William J. Myers v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
, when the exercise of such discretion turns upon a question of law, we review the question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7412 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 189
. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d 531, 541, 577 N.W.2d 352 (1998). We decide constitutional questions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29289 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of whether the facts satisfy the required constitutional standard is de novo. Anagnos, 341 Wis. 2d 576
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254344 - 2020-02-19

[PDF] Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
has been recited many times and need not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. See Park
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9165 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald V. Kurszewski
to be a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wills, 187 Wis.2d 529, 535, 523 N.W.2d 569, 572 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9198 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County v. Jessica M.
questions of law we review de novo. Czapinski v. St. Francis Hosp., 2000 WI 80, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6634 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 4
(1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31556 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, relying on the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435395 - 2021-10-05

[PDF] Scott R. Meyer v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Co.
to review this case de novo, we might make a different determination, but because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14837 - 2017-09-21