Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23191 - 23200 of 56931 for General Account Probate.
Search results 23191 - 23200 of 56931 for General Account Probate.
State v. John L. Kuslits
victim, who was in a close relationship with Kuslits, asked for probation. She told the court that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31
victim, who was in a close relationship with Kuslits, asked for probation. She told the court that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6859 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John L. Kuslits
. The mother of the other victim, who was in a close relationship with Kuslits, asked for probation. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6859 - 2017-09-20
. The mother of the other victim, who was in a close relationship with Kuslits, asked for probation. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6859 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In sentencing Whitford, the circuit court considered but rejected probation because of the severity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
. In sentencing Whitford, the circuit court considered but rejected probation because of the severity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
on a probation hold. He did not appear at the trial, request a continuance or otherwise communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
on a probation hold. He did not appear at the trial, request a continuance or otherwise communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Luitze
three sessions. ¶5 Luitze’s probation and parole agent testified that she revoked Luitze for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6606 - 2017-09-19
three sessions. ¶5 Luitze’s probation and parole agent testified that she revoked Luitze for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6606 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and placed Boettcher on three years’ probation. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶6 Boetcher contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
, and placed Boettcher on three years’ probation. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶6 Boetcher contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125387 - 2014-10-27
State v. Delbert L. Manke
to five years in prison and to two seven-year probation terms to run concurrent with one another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
to five years in prison and to two seven-year probation terms to run concurrent with one another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
’ probation with a condition that he serve sixty days in the county jail. Discussion ¶8 In reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27505 - 2006-12-18
’ probation with a condition that he serve sixty days in the county jail. Discussion ¶8 In reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27505 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
was withheld and Lee was placed on five years’ probation consecutive to the other sentence. ¶3 Lee first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32709 - 2008-05-20
was withheld and Lee was placed on five years’ probation consecutive to the other sentence. ¶3 Lee first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32709 - 2008-05-20
State v. Emmanuel Page
count, and ordered Page placed on probation for ten years. Page filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31
count, and ordered Page placed on probation for ten years. Page filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31