Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23191 - 23200 of 29823 for des.

Benedetta Balistrieri v. Joseph P. Balistrieri
not be elaborated here. See Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2). Our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5367 - 2005-03-31

Judith Clemence v. Maryland Casualty Company
summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2821 - 2005-03-31

State v. William T. Ackerman
establish reasonable suspicion or probable cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31

Susan L. Bellile v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6164 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35788 - 2009-03-09

COURT OF APPEALS
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30754 - 2007-11-05

State v. Foist Johnson
). We review the trial court’s denial of a Machner hearing de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11313 - 2005-03-31

Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the issue is whether the circuit court applied the correct legal standard, our review is de novo. Gallagher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27915 - 2007-01-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245087 - 2019-08-09