Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2321 - 2330 of 3970 for davie.

COURT OF APPEALS
to the protection of this rule, however, “the suspect must unambiguously request counsel.” Davis v. United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Reilly, P.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28

[PDF] Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
misperceived the existence of a gun. See Sherrod v. Berry, 856 F.2d 802 (7th Cir. 1988), Davis v. Freels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5648 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Larry G. Edwards
was with prejudice or without prejudice consistent with the ruling in State v. Davis, 242 Wis. 2d 344, 354 (Ct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21

Erland Anderson v. Dale Peterson
& Davis Const. Corp., 96 Wis.2d 314, 336, 291 N.W.2d 825, 836 (1980). Peterson’s agricultural engineering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14608 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. Here, the circuit court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104259 - 2017-09-21

State v. Freddie L. Carter
Carter, Evonne Carter, Thomas, and Carter’s girlfriend, Cherissa Davis. When Thomas told counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4424 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263152 - 2020-06-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100616 - 2017-09-21

Michael Hook v. William A. Bonner and Judith L. Bonner
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5538 - 2005-03-31