Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23201 - 23210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23201 - 23210 of 29823 for des.
Rita Roth v. City of Glendale
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13318 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13318 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shane M. Ferguson
is constitutional is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2112 - 2005-03-31
is constitutional is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2112 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, regardless of the circuit court’s understanding, we have accepted, for purposes of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86571 - 2012-08-29
. However, regardless of the circuit court’s understanding, we have accepted, for purposes of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86571 - 2012-08-29
State v. Dayna L. Lord
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31
Wayne R. Purdy v. Cap Gemini America, Inc.
court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting as true the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3447 - 2005-03-31
court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, accepting as true the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3447 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Candace M. Sorenson v. Howard E. Sorenson
affirm in part and reverse in part. We review issues of law de novo. Support and maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7881 - 2017-09-19
affirm in part and reverse in part. We review issues of law de novo. Support and maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7881 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lawyer Regulation System of the State of Wisconsin v. David C. Williams
(1997). No. 02-3327-D 12 Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16701 - 2017-09-21
(1997). No. 02-3327-D 12 Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16701 - 2017-09-21
John Ellis v. Marjorie R. Toutant
and void pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 765.03 and 765.04. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3044 - 2005-03-31
and void pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 765.03 and 765.04. Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous standard, and then we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40531 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard, and then we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40531 - 2014-09-15