Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23211 - 23220 of 57333 for id.

State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
himself with an ID card, and Potter confirmed that Groesbeck did not have a valid driver’s license. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4700 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Husbeck did not respond, he was not required to do so. See id., ¶39. However, the fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05

[PDF] State v. John E. Bacher
by clear and No. 95-1924-CR -3- convincing evidence. Id. at 213, 500 N.W.2d at 335. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9357 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently. Id., ¶39. B.C. was able to testify that he is prescribed injectable aripiprazole
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191024 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Christine Whiting v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co.
as long as it gives notice of its claim.” Id. at 1012, 480 N.W.2d at 841-42. A worker’s compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13949 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that verified his understanding and that the pleas were knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. See id., ¶35
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144292 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a fact constitutes a new factor is a question of law. See id., ¶33. Whether a new factor, if found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106694 - 2014-01-13

Timothy C. DeWerff v. Cynthia M. DeWerff
in child support proceedings. Id. The doctrine requires a showing of three elements: “(1) [a]ction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5058 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 828. The defendant has the burden of demonstrating the existence of a new factor. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817415 - 2024-06-26