Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23221 - 23230 of 29827 for des.
Search results 23221 - 23230 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 64, 799 N.W.2d 850 (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 64, 799 N.W.2d 850 (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9460 - 2005-03-31
review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9460 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16726 - 2005-03-31
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16726 - 2005-03-31
John L. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
.[1] Statutory construction is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16854 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Statutory construction is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16854 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, as a question of law, whether the undisputed facts satisfy the constitutional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76455 - 2012-01-11
de novo, as a question of law, whether the undisputed facts satisfy the constitutional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76455 - 2012-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See United Rentals, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2007 WI App 131, ¶11, 302 Wis. 2d 245, 733
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71885 - 2011-10-05
review de novo. See United Rentals, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2007 WI App 131, ¶11, 302 Wis. 2d 245, 733
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71885 - 2011-10-05
[PDF]
Town of La Grange v. Robert J. Auchinleck
hinges on the construction of § 19.21, STATS. This presents a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11719 - 2014-09-15
hinges on the construction of § 19.21, STATS. This presents a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11719 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
involves a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Zimbrick v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 106, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30
involves a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Zimbrick v. LIRC, 2000 WI App 106, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30