Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23221 - 23230 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23221 - 23230 of 29823 for des.
State v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
offense presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767, 791
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11740 - 2005-03-31
offense presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767, 791
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11740 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Brandt
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rebecca E. Roethke v. James B. Roethke
. or 2. No. 97-0587 6 which we review de novo. Schwegler v. Schwegler, 142 Wis.2d 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12144 - 2017-09-21
. or 2. No. 97-0587 6 which we review de novo. Schwegler v. Schwegler, 142 Wis.2d 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12144 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
James N. Elliott v. Michael L. Morgan
is de novo. See id. The statute at issue in this case is § 66.293(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See id. The statute at issue in this case is § 66.293(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of Hartland, 2004 WI App 144, ¶12, 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27414 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of Hartland, 2004 WI App 144, ¶12, 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be sentenced on accurate information is a constitutional question we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155631 - 2017-09-21
to be sentenced on accurate information is a constitutional question we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Laurie A. Koch
, 227 Wis. 2d 167, 205, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15560 - 2017-09-21
, 227 Wis. 2d 167, 205, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, we determine the appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156712 - 2017-09-21
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, we determine the appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles F. Kozlik v. Gulf Insurance Company
of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6079 - 2017-09-19
of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin, 206 Wis. 2d 610, 624, 557 N.W.2d 487 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6079 - 2017-09-19