Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23231 - 23240 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23231 - 23240 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20
State v. John E. Stephens
in circuit court. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
in circuit court. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9457 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts satisfy the constitutional standard for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120102 - 2014-08-20
facts satisfy the constitutional standard for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120102 - 2014-08-20
Hoida, Inc. v. M&I Midstate Bank
or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same method as did the circuit court. Cole v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6749 - 2005-03-31
or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same method as did the circuit court. Cole v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6749 - 2005-03-31
Nancy Johnson Carrick v. Lawrence L. Foster
. Although we review the trial court’s decision de novo, we apply the same standard and methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11096 - 2005-03-31
. Although we review the trial court’s decision de novo, we apply the same standard and methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11096 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16726 - 2017-09-21
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David J. Carmain v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
, this particular issue involves questions of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4604 - 2017-09-19
, this particular issue involves questions of statutory interpretation which we decide de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Motions for Summary Judgment ¶16 “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147269 - 2017-09-21
. Motions for Summary Judgment ¶16 “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jennifer L. Weston v. Matthew J. B.
, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Elec. Co-op., 2001 WI App 276, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20999 - 2017-09-21
, which this court reviews de novo. Gallagher v. Grant-Lafayette Elec. Co-op., 2001 WI App 276, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
instruction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 191 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶25 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21
instruction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 191 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶25 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14910 - 2017-09-21