Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23231 - 23240 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23231 - 23240 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but applies the facts to the law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177416 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but applies the facts to the law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Randall Lemke v. George Arrowood
. However, the construction of a written contract presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15612 - 2017-09-21
. However, the construction of a written contract presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Edley H. Stewart v. Farmers Insurance Group
review is de novo. Id. at 315- 17. Summary judgment should be granted “if the pleadings, depositions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21369 - 2017-09-21
review is de novo. Id. at 315- 17. Summary judgment should be granted “if the pleadings, depositions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶21, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties’ arbitration agreement is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Osborn v. Dennison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172912 - 2017-09-21
of the parties’ arbitration agreement is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Osborn v. Dennison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Philip M. Mydlach v. Wayne Curt Kiser
is de novo; we apply the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2001-02),5 in the same manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6178 - 2017-09-19
is de novo; we apply the standards set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2001-02),5 in the same manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and voluntary despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy. Id., ¶40. This court determines de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45543 - 2014-09-15
and voluntary despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy. Id., ¶40. This court determines de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45543 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. Id. ¶13 Zarter contends that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68300 - 2011-07-20
decides de novo. Id. ¶13 Zarter contends that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68300 - 2011-07-20
State v. Tony Nollie
. Whether a crime is amenable to the privilege of self-defense is a question of law, which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16364 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a crime is amenable to the privilege of self-defense is a question of law, which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16364 - 2005-03-31