Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 83945 for case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
) and 346.65(2)(f), both as second offenses. ¶3 The case was set for a jury trial. During voir dire, juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31953 - 2014-09-15
) and 346.65(2)(f), both as second offenses. ¶3 The case was set for a jury trial. During voir dire, juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31953 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
disapproving of the ordinance, in which case the ordinance will not become effective. Section 59.69(5)(e)6. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27363 - 2006-12-06
disapproving of the ordinance, in which case the ordinance will not become effective. Section 59.69(5)(e)6. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27363 - 2006-12-06
[PDF]
WI 48
& October 2025 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037816 - 2025-11-11
& October 2025 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037816 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Gary Bryant
for postconviction relief seeking to withdraw his plea.1 We affirm. I. This case was plea bargained. In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11928 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief seeking to withdraw his plea.1 We affirm. I. This case was plea bargained. In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. 1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). I summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137252 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. 1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). I summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674522 - 2023-07-06
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674522 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Juanita K. Von Ruden
misdemeanor cases, violates art. I, § 7 and art. I, § 5 of the Wisconsin Constitution. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13145 - 2017-09-21
misdemeanor cases, violates art. I, § 7 and art. I, § 5 of the Wisconsin Constitution. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13145 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. The Proposal ¶2 This case began when CESA sought a declaratory ruling from WERC on whether CESA had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
. The Proposal ¶2 This case began when CESA sought a declaratory ruling from WERC on whether CESA had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Stene
is whether Kohnke had probable cause to believe that Stene was operating while intoxicated. In OWI cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19021 - 2017-09-21
is whether Kohnke had probable cause to believe that Stene was operating while intoxicated. In OWI cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19021 - 2017-09-21