Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 29823 for des.
State v. John S. Provo
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. at 128. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id. at 128. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6624 - 2005-03-31
Luann M. Lawrence v. Wayman C. Lawrence
. Nichols, 162 Wis. 2d 96, 103, 469 N.W. 2d 619 (1991). We review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31
. Nichols, 162 Wis. 2d 96, 103, 469 N.W. 2d 619 (1991). We review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31
Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA Associates
of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo. Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6653 - 2005-03-31
of a contract are definite presents a question of law that we review de novo. Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6653 - 2005-03-31
Steven H. Roehl v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Bennett negligent as a matter of law. We review directed verdicts de novo. Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20
Bennett negligent as a matter of law. We review directed verdicts de novo. Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35265 - 2009-01-20
State v. Roy J. Jones
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methods as the circuit court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71801 - 2014-09-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methods as the circuit court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love, 284 Wis. 2d 111, ¶26. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love, 284 Wis. 2d 111, ¶26. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sarah R.P.
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
. The standard of review is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Foist Johnson
denial of a Machner hearing de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19
denial of a Machner hearing de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11313 - 2017-09-19