Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Burnett County v. AFSCME Local 279-A
review de novo by applying the same standards set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
review de novo by applying the same standards set forth in § 802.08(2), STATS., employed by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10940 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 46
. We uphold the court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264273 - 2020-08-11
. We uphold the court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264273 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the circuit court’s findings of fact and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366845 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Scheiwe
requires interpretation of § 939.74(3), a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whitman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3544 - 2017-09-19
requires interpretation of § 939.74(3), a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whitman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3544 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Walter G. Bohrer, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19
facts presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. Wis. Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3266 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶15 The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶15 The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis. 2d 492, ¶5. ¶20 Schabow first asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144102 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Williams, 249 Wis. 2d 492, ¶5. ¶20 Schabow first asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sheri Gould v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
which we review de novo. Rockweit v. Senecal, No. 93-1130, op. at 15 (S. Ct. Dec. 20, 1995). One
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16892 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. Rockweit v. Senecal, No. 93-1130, op. at 15 (S. Ct. Dec. 20, 1995). One
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16892 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 171
of law that we review de novo. See Nelson v. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. See Nelson v. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Harold C. Lane, Jr. v. Sharp Packaging Systems, Inc.
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Town of Eagle, 191 Wis. 2d at 311- 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3720 - 2017-09-19
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Town of Eagle, 191 Wis. 2d at 311- 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3720 - 2017-09-19