Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 59033 for do.

COURT OF APPEALS
and see what the vehicle’s driver was going to do. ¶8 The vehicle drove straight through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109478 - 2014-03-24

State v. Karen A.O.
. Consistency has nothing to do with the five-sixths rule. This is shown by Utecht v. Steinhagel, 54 Wis.2d 507
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9931 - 2005-03-31

Randy Major v. County of Milwaukee
by a government employee or agent to do something within the scope of his or her duties can be discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Clyde B. Williams
by the judge). However, the circuit court’s docket entries do not refer to the entry of the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14806 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
court explained: “We do have—I mean the statement—the actions are bizarre given the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88743 - 2012-10-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of initial incarceration. And they do have programming within the institution.” With the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23

[PDF] NOTICE
mark. I can control her. I can make her do what I want. I can pimp her. And you did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36574 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kerry D. Severson v. Donald Gudmanson
how to do so. I did see Ann and I did thank her. Severson requested the attendance of several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13039 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
miles, and the totality of the circumstances do not support a reasonable suspicion that he was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10

[PDF] State v. Daniel Zembruski
, 434 N.W.2d 386, 388 (1989). The parties do not dispute the relevant facts. All of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13089 - 2017-09-21