Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23241 - 23250 of 58991 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. William H. Foucault
, STATS., 1993-94. They claim the trial court failed to make sufficient findings of fact to support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15321 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The State argues that because King had a prior direct appeal, his claim is barred by rule in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79515 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238787 - 2019-04-05

State v. Willie L. Bland
. In this appeal, Bland only challenges the factual analysis. As noted above, he claims that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11321 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” On March 2, 2023, Asher filed a claim for legal services showing that each party still owed her $1,722.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11

State v. Kenneth R. Parrish
. Parrish appeals pro se from an order denying his postconvicton motion. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20778 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689020 - 2023-08-08

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194839 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. George G. Kidd
counsel. He claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to impeach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
counsel claim, as procedurally barred by WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) (2001-02) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28151 - 2014-09-15