Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23251 - 23260 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23251 - 23260 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
of her parental rights to Carson E. B. Callen claims that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102285 - 2013-09-24
of her parental rights to Carson E. B. Callen claims that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102285 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to shorten the length of his extended supervision. We reject each of Lynch’s claims and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135949 - 2015-03-03
to shorten the length of his extended supervision. We reject each of Lynch’s claims and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135949 - 2015-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
between Meis and Randall Kordus was procedurally and substantively equitable. Meis claims she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
between Meis and Randall Kordus was procedurally and substantively equitable. Meis claims she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19
State v. Paul Matek
. Paul Matek claims that the pattern jury instruction for commitment as a sexually violent person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
. Paul Matek claims that the pattern jury instruction for commitment as a sexually violent person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jameel A. Ali
misconduct that deprived him of a fair trial. Ali claims that the State “sought to bolster” T.S.'s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
misconduct that deprived him of a fair trial. Ali claims that the State “sought to bolster” T.S.'s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius Newman
and 941.28, Stats.[1] Newman claims: (1) the trial court erred when it took judicial notice of co-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
and 941.28, Stats.[1] Newman claims: (1) the trial court erred when it took judicial notice of co-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13946 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Szulczewski
under § 971.17, Stats.[1] Defendant also claims the application of the enhanced penalties for battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2011-01-12
under § 971.17, Stats.[1] Defendant also claims the application of the enhanced penalties for battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2011-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Maurice S. Ewing
. ¶6 The jury found Ewing guilty on all four counts. Ewing moved for postconviction relief, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
. ¶6 The jury found Ewing guilty on all four counts. Ewing moved for postconviction relief, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
; (2) if that debt is collectible by YP, then YP’s claim is barred by judicial estoppel because its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137262 - 2015-03-11
; (2) if that debt is collectible by YP, then YP’s claim is barred by judicial estoppel because its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137262 - 2015-03-11
State v. William R. Scott
claims: (1) the trial court erred when it determined that the Criminal Penalties Study Committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) the trial court erred when it determined that the Criminal Penalties Study Committee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31