Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23261 - 23270 of 40101 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. David Barton
. Id. at 65. Second, the hearsay statement must “bear[] adequate ‘indicia of reliability.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Barton
, the declarant must be unavailable to testify at trial. Id. at 65. Second, the hearsay statement must “bear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24

Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
deposition testimony and her in-court statements, the court found that the grounds for abandonment had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14615 - 2005-03-31

Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
deposition testimony and her in-court statements, the court found that the grounds for abandonment had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14616 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
: Wis. Stat. § 227.01(13). "Rule" means a regulation, standard, statement of policy, or general order
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158414 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to punish Lawver’s conduct of delivering the statements in a loud and threatening manner. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63594 - 2011-05-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statements set out in the report were used to prove the truth of the matter asserted and were testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211706 - 2018-04-24

[PDF] State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer
. In an attempt to impeach them, Aaron produced prior statements describing types of sexual assault he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2155 - 2017-09-19

Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
deposition testimony and her in-court statements, the court found that the grounds for abandonment had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14614 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Meledez’s [sic] statements to myself constitute exculpatory evidence that the jury should have heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101743 - 2013-09-09