Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23271 - 23280 of 29828 for des.

[PDF] Krier Realty, Inc. v. Edward Kubricky
judgment de novo. Waters v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278, 369 N.W.2d 755 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3910 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Luis R. Davila-Diaz
] or [Davila-Diaz] tell you why they had to kill Carmen Hernandez and Juan De[L]ossantos? A. They were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6511 - 2017-09-19

2009 WI APP 19
We review de novo the grant and denial of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34790 - 2011-06-14

Edward P. Barnes v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
de novo whether the sanction of dismissal was the appropriate remedy in this case. “A trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19971 - 2005-10-18

State v. Mervel L. Eagans, Jr.
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311 (1990). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13790 - 2005-03-31

Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6037 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2006 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85742 - 2012-08-07

[PDF] NOTICE
and voluntary despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy. Id., ¶40. This court determines de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45543 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 37
," and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo. Id., ¶¶18-19
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36600 - 2014-09-15

Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
over this appeal. Whether a new issue was raised presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31