Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23281 - 23290 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 23281 - 23290 of 82833 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
., ¶¶25-26. In the instant case, the record shows that Stewart previously was convicted of a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195400 - 2017-09-21
., ¶¶25-26. In the instant case, the record shows that Stewart previously was convicted of a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kirk Ennenga
pending a period of fifteen years on probation, Judge Bissonnette commented: [A] case like this, I guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31
pending a period of fifteen years on probation, Judge Bissonnette commented: [A] case like this, I guess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory Poston
.” (Capitalization omitted.) At the sentencing hearing in this case, however, both the State and Poston's lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12669 - 2005-03-31
.” (Capitalization omitted.) At the sentencing hearing in this case, however, both the State and Poston's lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory K. Scott
No. [Enter Case No. and Press Close] 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11598 - 2017-09-19
No. [Enter Case No. and Press Close] 1 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11598 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
, P.J.[1] In this termination of parental rights case, the circuit court decided on summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70172 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Percy Ray Morgan
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21