Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23291 - 23300 of 68771 for did.
Search results 23291 - 23300 of 68771 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Balint
. He did receive initial representation from a public defender. However, the public defender moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8706 - 2017-09-19
. He did receive initial representation from a public defender. However, the public defender moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8706 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
because the clerk of circuit court did not have authority to amend the original judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118164 - 2014-07-28
because the clerk of circuit court did not have authority to amend the original judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118164 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
penalties including the potential fines. However, during the plea colloquy the court did not mention any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141321 - 2015-05-04
penalties including the potential fines. However, during the plea colloquy the court did not mention any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141321 - 2015-05-04
State v. Pastor Ramirez
. The defendant must also allege that he did not know or understand the information that should have been provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26145 - 2006-08-09
. The defendant must also allege that he did not know or understand the information that should have been provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26145 - 2006-08-09
State v. Donald D. Laufer
him because he did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4041 - 2005-03-31
him because he did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waive his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Ganley
. Dated this 27th day of April, 1998. before accepting such waivers.”[1] Ganley contends that Ross did
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12439 - 2005-03-31
. Dated this 27th day of April, 1998. before accepting such waivers.”[1] Ganley contends that Ross did
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12439 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Rogers
, Stats. Rogers did not respond to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10343 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Rogers did not respond to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Lucero’s assertion, as reported in the no-merit report, that he did not understand that the joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195517 - 2017-09-21
Lucero’s assertion, as reported in the no-merit report, that he did not understand that the joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles A. Montgomery
is whether the jury heard sufficient evidence to convict him. We conclude that the State did introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8262 - 2017-09-19
is whether the jury heard sufficient evidence to convict him. We conclude that the State did introduce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8262 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian J. Coerper
to present an alternative defense after the defense offered at trial did not succeed. See State v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12901 - 2005-03-31
to present an alternative defense after the defense offered at trial did not succeed. See State v. Hubanks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12901 - 2005-03-31