Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2331 - 2340 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 2331 - 2340 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Jordan
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert Verdone
) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser included offense of simple battery; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser included offense of simple battery; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Verdone
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; (3) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8416 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; (3) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8416 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(2009-10). Upon Mendoza’s guilty plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-seven year bifurcated sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2013-03-19
(2009-10). Upon Mendoza’s guilty plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-seven year bifurcated sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2013-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by this court. 1 Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107613 - 2017-09-21
by this court. 1 Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107613 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by this court.[1] Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
by this court.[1] Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
.1 Schipke claims that the trial court: (1) erred in refusing to grant a mistrial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39960 - 2014-09-15
.1 Schipke claims that the trial court: (1) erred in refusing to grant a mistrial when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39960 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Matysik.[1] Schipke claims that the trial court: (1) erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39960 - 2009-08-24
and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Matysik.[1] Schipke claims that the trial court: (1) erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39960 - 2009-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Grady W. and his wife, Corliss W. On October 9, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136569 - 2017-09-21
of Grady W. and his wife, Corliss W. On October 9, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136569 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20
denying her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20