Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2331 - 2340 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 2331 - 2340 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Scott Heimermann
. presided over the trial. The Honorable Arlene D. Connors decided Heimermann's postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
. presided over the trial. The Honorable Arlene D. Connors decided Heimermann's postconviction motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 941.29(2) (2011-12).1 In postconviction proceedings, Willis alleged that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293995 - 2020-10-06
, 941.29(2) (2011-12).1 In postconviction proceedings, Willis alleged that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293995 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Lionel N. Anderson
) No. 2004AP2010-CR 2 (2001-02). 1 Anderson submits that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19890 - 2017-09-21
) No. 2004AP2010-CR 2 (2001-02). 1 Anderson submits that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by this court. 1 Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107613 - 2017-09-21
by this court. 1 Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107613 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Jordan
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
consent, all as party to the crime, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10995 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
by this court.[1] Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
by this court.[1] Geyer argues that the trial court erred in determining that: (1) Geyer understood the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Robert Verdone
) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser included offense of simple battery; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser included offense of simple battery; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Verdone
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; (3) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8416 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; (3) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8416 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(2009-10). Upon Mendoza’s guilty plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-seven year bifurcated sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2014-05-18
(2009-10). Upon Mendoza’s guilty plea, the trial court imposed a twenty-seven year bifurcated sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94285 - 2014-05-18
State v. Joshua W.
hearing was defective, that the trial court’s failure to hold trial within twenty days of arraignment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31
hearing was defective, that the trial court’s failure to hold trial within twenty days of arraignment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31