Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23301 - 23310 of 30245 for de.
Search results 23301 - 23310 of 30245 for de.
State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
-examination violates a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6136 - 2005-03-31
-examination violates a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6136 - 2005-03-31
Steven H. Roehl v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
review of a summary judgment is de novo. See M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶15 The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
a new factor exists is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶36. ¶15 The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
on April 5, 2000, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3748 - 2017-09-19
on April 5, 2000, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Green County Dep’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3748 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 117
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
not make a sufficient showing on one, see Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697, and we decide de novo the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Perles Payne
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9556 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9556 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the determination of the date of discovery is a question of law which we will review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105846 - 2017-09-21
, the determination of the date of discovery is a question of law which we will review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The Lisses assert that we should employ a de novo standard of review because the issues on appeal do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241005 - 2019-05-23
The Lisses assert that we should employ a de novo standard of review because the issues on appeal do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241005 - 2019-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 As the trial court observed, it conducted a de novo hearing on the second motion hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185747 - 2017-09-21
4 As the trial court observed, it conducted a de novo hearing on the second motion hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
are undisputed, we are presented with a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Williams, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14040 - 2014-09-15
are undisputed, we are presented with a question of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Williams, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14040 - 2014-09-15