Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23311 - 23320 of 83446 for case code.
Search results 23311 - 23320 of 83446 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16322 - 2017-09-21
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kathleen M. Schmitt v. Arnold C. Schmitt
2001 WI App 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-0695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2384 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-0695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 192
2007 WI APP 192 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29801 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 192 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29801 - 2014-09-15
State v. Philip M. Canon
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3519-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14880 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3519-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14880 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julie Ann Quinn
pains were simply a case of food poisoning, and that she thought the delivery was a miscarriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13629 - 2017-09-21
pains were simply a case of food poisoning, and that she thought the delivery was a miscarriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Curtis Brewer
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7906 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7906 - 2017-09-19
State v. John F. Goralski
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen R. Hart
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31