Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23311 - 23320 of 30245 for de.

[PDF] Sandra K. Ward v. Dennis Jahnke
forth in Watts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Waage, 188 Wis.2d at 328, 525 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12791 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert A. Smith v. Janet H. Sahagian
and the construction of a stipulation are both questions of law that we review de novo. See Estate of Cavanaugh v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frederick W. Prager
standard of review is de novo. See State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17633 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94724 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 136
a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33680 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Randall Lemke v. George Arrowood
. However, the construction of a written contract presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15612 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Marvin L. Hereford
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13971 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Agustin Velez
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. These allegations must be "'factual-objective,'" i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11315 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Derek Miller
is a legal issue. Therefore, we will review de novo the trial court’s interpretation of the statute. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13618 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Addison Insurance Company v. James Korsmo
on a question of law, however, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s analysis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7535 - 2017-09-19