Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23311 - 23320 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 23311 - 23320 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks a new trial either in the interest of justice or because his trial No. 2012AP229-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90808 - 2014-09-15
seeks a new trial either in the interest of justice or because his trial No. 2012AP229-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90808 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the effectiveness of trial counsel. She also asks this court to No. 2016AP27-CR 2 order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184629 - 2017-09-21
and the effectiveness of trial counsel. She also asks this court to No. 2016AP27-CR 2 order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184629 - 2017-09-21
State v. Pao V.
. He brought a motion to suppress his statements and the weapons. The Waukesha trial court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15806 - 2005-03-31
. He brought a motion to suppress his statements and the weapons. The Waukesha trial court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15806 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brandon J. Matke
of an intoxicant (OMVWI) and imposed a sentence for sixth-offense OMVWI. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6804 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant (OMVWI) and imposed a sentence for sixth-offense OMVWI. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6804 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Rudoll
is a second-degree sexual assault charge and the focus of this appeal. Rudoll contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
is a second-degree sexual assault charge and the focus of this appeal. Rudoll contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7183 - 2005-03-31
Certification
is immediately appealable, is the trial court’s order in the instant case—which determines that the arbitration
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92462 - 2013-02-04
is immediately appealable, is the trial court’s order in the instant case—which determines that the arbitration
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92462 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is unconstitutionally vague. She also asks us to grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Rebecca’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73881 - 2011-11-14
is unconstitutionally vague. She also asks us to grant a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Rebecca’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73881 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP2482 Cir. Ct. Nos. 2002SC13843
denying a motion to compel arbitration is immediately appealable, is the trial court’s order
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92462 - 2014-09-15
denying a motion to compel arbitration is immediately appealable, is the trial court’s order
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92462 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 948.07(1) (2003-04)1 and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32607 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.07(1) (2003-04)1 and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). On appeal, Rebecca argues the statute is unconstitutionally vague. She also asks us to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73881 - 2014-09-15
). On appeal, Rebecca argues the statute is unconstitutionally vague. She also asks us to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73881 - 2014-09-15