Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23331 - 23340 of 33891 for dismissed.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trespass, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining counts. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92929 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
placed on electronic monitoring without a court order. The circuit court dismissed Campbell’s petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193897 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mooney & Lesage & Associates, Ltd. v. Germantown Marketplace, Inc.
& Lesage & Associates, Ltd. (MLA) appeals from a judgment dismissing its action against Germantown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14810 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
dismissed. The State was free to argue at sentencing. After receiving a six-year sentence, Winfrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7907 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Amy Willoughby
presentation of its case, Willoughby moved to dismiss for failure of the State to put forth a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12407 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The circuit court granted Rauch’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Webster’s action. We review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904957 - 2025-01-24

CA Blank Order
testimony concerning this dismissed charge affected the adjudicator’s impartiality. Next, Amerstate argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18

State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
were dismissed. The State was free to argue at sentencing. After receiving a six-year sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
misdemeanors, and the carrying a concealed weapon charge was dismissed. He was sentenced to serve nine months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27935 - 2007-01-29

State v. Steven A. Hipwood
. Hipwood moved to dismiss the criminal charges, arguing that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10297 - 2005-03-31