Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23331 - 23340 of 63981 for records/1000.

Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
to determine whether it was substantially justified, we look to the record of both the underlying government
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11290 - 2005-03-31

Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
as to mandate reversal” because the trial court investigated on its own, conducted off-the-record experiments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3879 - 2005-03-31

Jerry L. Meana v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
by that employment. The issue is whether there is sufficient evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9222 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George W. Perkins
’ sentence. Perkins asserts it is plain from the record that the trial court relied on the erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16057 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
consistent with money taken from Mike was found in Higgenbottom’s pocket. 2 ¶4 Records from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190428 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=12&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=All&beg_date=&end_date=&page=2

State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
the “deficient sample” printout on the test record card printed by the Intoxilyzer 5000, which was utilized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14019 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a transcript of this plea hearing in the record, but this fact is not disputed. 3 Crystal’s plea-change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33347 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David Beck
to police should not have been admitted because the tape recording of the statement was destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19

Whitecaps Homes, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of Review
claims that: (1) the Board’s assessment is without evidentiary support in the record; (2) the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11063 - 2014-12-01