Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23331 - 23340 of 58285 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea because the trial court did not comply with the proper requirements during his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28930 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daryl Thomas Griffin
revocation should have been barred under the doctrine of laches; and (4) the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14811 - 2005-03-31

Kenosha County v. Michael H. Hines
of conviction for disorderly conduct in violation of Kenosha County, Wis., Ordinance § 9.09. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12056 - 2014-12-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
relating to pretrial and trial proceedings. Based on our independent review of the record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872713 - 2024-11-07

State v. William Medina
the trial court or this court with any adequate reason why he could not have raised the present issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6197 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on counsel’s failure to call seven witnesses. He argues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34465 - 2008-10-30

[PDF] State v. William R.S.
., empowers this court to grant a new trial because the real controversy was not tried. We order a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9507 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eric E. Erdos
the trial court violated his due process rights by ruling that Erdos could not present testimony that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8555 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John H. Rockett
of property identification marks pursuant to § 943.37(3), STATS. The judgment followed the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9866 - 2017-09-19

Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company v. William P. Trainor
and filed this action to enforce a noncompetition covenant in his employment contract. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16106 - 2005-03-31