Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23341 - 23350 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that later tested positive for THC. They administered field sobriety tests and later transported Frederick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that later tested positive for THC. They administered field sobriety tests and later transported Frederick
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and proceeded to administer field sobriety tests. Based on Dopp’s performance on the field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942615 - 2025-04-17

State v. Encarnacion F.
as § 968.24, Stats. The test is objective and the focus is on reasonableness. See Waldner, 206 Wis.2d at 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14501 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that a stipulation to the effect that the substance he was accused of possessing had tested positive as cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
test: ‘What would a reasonable police officer reasonably suspect in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818007 - 2024-06-25

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31

State v. Todd E. Crider
subvert the purpose of the statute. Instead, the judge reasoned that the five-year term is a “testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15524 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31