Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP1834 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194750 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP1834 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Ferron v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
The facts are not disputed. This is a highway condemnation case. DOT presented the Ferrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11339 - 2017-09-19
The facts are not disputed. This is a highway condemnation case. DOT presented the Ferrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11339 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new order is nonfinal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
of the Hamms in this case. For reasons explained in our January 4 order, this new order is nonfinal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94483 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
CURIAM. This case involves a challenge to the circuit court’s award of attorney’s fees. The appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58173 - 2010-12-28
Kelly J. McKinstry v. Marvin J. Kramer
both. Indeed, that is what the jury found in this case. The Association’s argument, if adopted, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11223 - 2005-03-31
both. Indeed, that is what the jury found in this case. The Association’s argument, if adopted, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11223 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Brenton R
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803527 - 2024-05-22
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Brenton R
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803527 - 2024-05-22
[MS WORD]
CR-226: Waiver of Right to Attorney
to Attorney Case No. I am asking the court to allow me to represent myself and give up my
/formdisplay/CR-226.doc?formNumber=CR-226&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-05
to Attorney Case No. I am asking the court to allow me to represent myself and give up my
/formdisplay/CR-226.doc?formNumber=CR-226&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-05
State v. Glenn Van Remmen
)." Without objection, the case proceeded to jury trial as a criminal case. The trial court instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12481 - 2005-03-31
)." Without objection, the case proceeded to jury trial as a criminal case. The trial court instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12481 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97315 - 2013-05-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97315 - 2013-05-21