Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 57894 for id.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 57894 for id.
Timothy C. DeWerff v. Cynthia M. DeWerff
in child support proceedings. Id. The doctrine requires a showing of three elements: “(1) [a]ction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5058 - 2005-03-31
in child support proceedings. Id. The doctrine requires a showing of three elements: “(1) [a]ction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case.” However, the transaction in Below occurred in February 2004. Id., ¶8. In a published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68389 - 2014-09-15
to this case.” However, the transaction in Below occurred in February 2004. Id., ¶8. In a published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68389 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey Turner
allow him to represent himself. Id. at 204. To establish proper waiver of counsel, the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5777 - 2005-03-31
allow him to represent himself. Id. at 204. To establish proper waiver of counsel, the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5777 - 2005-03-31
State v. Troy Petrauski
by the trial court’s decision on that issue. See id. The fundamental focus of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31
by the trial court’s decision on that issue. See id. The fundamental focus of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth G. Hopkins
. App. 1979). It is the duty of Hopkins to preserve such testimony. See id. Because he has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11962 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1979). It is the duty of Hopkins to preserve such testimony. See id. Because he has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11962 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, we will construe the contract as it stands. Id. If the State breaches the plea agreement by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2009-07-22
, we will construe the contract as it stands. Id. If the State breaches the plea agreement by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2009-07-22
State v. Scott M. Doering
that intrusion. Id. The police officer is entitled to draw specific reasonable inferences from the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
that intrusion. Id. The police officer is entitled to draw specific reasonable inferences from the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lamont Caldwell
to challenge the ruling on appeal. See id. Caldwell contends that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7688 - 2005-03-31
to challenge the ruling on appeal. See id. Caldwell contends that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and unambiguous, we will construe the contract as it stands. Id. If the State breaches the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38151 - 2014-09-15
and unambiguous, we will construe the contract as it stands. Id. If the State breaches the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38151 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
the front of the squad car. He identified himself with an ID card, and Potter confirmed that Groesbeck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
the front of the squad car. He identified himself with an ID card, and Potter confirmed that Groesbeck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19