Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 23351 - 23360 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. James Warren
the victim’s testimony, DNA test results and other crimes evidence. The jury found Warren guilty on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11717 - 2017-09-20
the victim’s testimony, DNA test results and other crimes evidence. The jury found Warren guilty on all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11717 - 2017-09-20
State v. Eugene Nichols
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Eugene Nichols appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Eugene Nichols appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wesley H., Sr.
court’s discretion. State v. Pankow, 144 Wis. 2d 23, 47, 422 N.W.2d 913, 921 (Ct. App. 1988). In a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6465 - 2005-03-31
court’s discretion. State v. Pankow, 144 Wis. 2d 23, 47, 422 N.W.2d 913, 921 (Ct. App. 1988). In a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6465 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
case, the court could reasonably conclude that the jury would give it undue weight. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
case, the court could reasonably conclude that the jury would give it undue weight. Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
State v. Hardill Bowie
to move to strike the entire jury panel after one prospective juror, a jail employee, stated that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21225 - 2006-02-06
to move to strike the entire jury panel after one prospective juror, a jail employee, stated that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21225 - 2006-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm. ¶2 Phiffer was convicted after a jury trial. On his first appeal we affirmed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30879 - 2007-11-14
. We affirm. ¶2 Phiffer was convicted after a jury trial. On his first appeal we affirmed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30879 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
him after a jury trial of unlawfully possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
him after a jury trial of unlawfully possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581281 - 2022-10-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
I.N. share, in order to provide a context for the jury when it evaluated I.N.’s testimony. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140339 - 2017-09-21
I.N. share, in order to provide a context for the jury when it evaluated I.N.’s testimony. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on October 29, 2020 and ended the following day. The matter proceeded to a jury trial where the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
on October 29, 2020 and ended the following day. The matter proceeded to a jury trial where the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the greater Milwaukee area in 1995.3 After a jury trial, Derek Williams was convicted of twelve counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04
the greater Milwaukee area in 1995.3 After a jury trial, Derek Williams was convicted of twelve counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04