Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 46075 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 46075 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
much memory of the crash. A preliminary breath test revealed that Torbeck did not have any alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
much memory of the crash. A preliminary breath test revealed that Torbeck did not have any alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prong of the Strickland test, the other prong need not be addressed. Id. at 697. Whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145352 - 2015-07-27
prong of the Strickland test, the other prong need not be addressed. Id. at 697. Whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145352 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, however, the defendant must satisfy a two-prong test. See id., ¶36. First, the defendant must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260975 - 2020-05-19
, however, the defendant must satisfy a two-prong test. See id., ¶36. First, the defendant must
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260975 - 2020-05-19
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15521 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15522 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” The actuarial tests and the results were essentially the same, although they produced different diagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
.” The actuarial tests and the results were essentially the same, although they produced different diagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Kane
his pleas. Therefore, we apply the clearly erroneous test to the court’s findings. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
his pleas. Therefore, we apply the clearly erroneous test to the court’s findings. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
(citations omitted). The test, however, is not a sufficiency of the evidence test. Id., ¶125. An error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
(citations omitted). The test, however, is not a sufficiency of the evidence test. Id., ¶125. An error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant has not proven one prong of this test, it need not address the other. Id. (citing Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
that the defendant has not proven one prong of this test, it need not address the other. Id. (citing Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Ray Toles
. The test of reasonableness in search and seizure matters is objective. See, e.g., State v. Secrist, 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3710 - 2017-09-19
. The test of reasonableness in search and seizure matters is objective. See, e.g., State v. Secrist, 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3710 - 2017-09-19