Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 30245 for de.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 30245 for de.
Bert L. Warnecke, Sr. v. Bert L. Warnecke II
of Wis. Stat. § 77.88. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
of Wis. Stat. § 77.88. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. See State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we apply constitutional principle to the facts de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17
unless clearly erroneous, but we apply constitutional principle to the facts de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30269 - 2007-09-17
State v. John Foster Fant
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
Philip M. Mydlach v. Wayne Curt Kiser
about the scope of its ruling. In any event, our review of summary judgment is de novo; we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6178 - 2005-03-31
about the scope of its ruling. In any event, our review of summary judgment is de novo; we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6178 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
regarding the effective date of a statutory amendment is a question of law we determine de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32142 - 2008-03-18
regarding the effective date of a statutory amendment is a question of law we determine de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32142 - 2008-03-18
Jerome J. Miezin v. Midwest Express Airlines, Inc.
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18147 - 2005-07-06
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18147 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Martin
-3131 5 law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
-3131 5 law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the court did not clearly err, but we review de novo whether the facts meet the deficiency or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
as the court did not clearly err, but we review de novo whether the facts meet the deficiency or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Since Barrett did not request a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Since Barrett did not request a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261141 - 2020-05-19
that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261141 - 2020-05-19