Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 As the trial court observed, it conducted a de novo hearing on the second motion hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185747 - 2017-09-21
4 As the trial court observed, it conducted a de novo hearing on the second motion hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jane L. Trucksa v. Joseph B. Snyder
judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10732 - 2017-09-20
judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10732 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Andrew J. K.
of a statute are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24967 - 2017-09-21
of a statute are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 64, 799 N.W.2d 850 (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 64, 799 N.W.2d 850 (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel. Whiting v. Kolb, 158 Wis.2d 226, 233, 461 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13972 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9460 - 2005-03-31
review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis.2d 131, 140, 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9460 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16726 - 2005-03-31
). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, 248 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16726 - 2005-03-31
John L. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
.[1] Statutory construction is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16854 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Statutory construction is a question of law which this court decides de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donavan D. Theno
)). Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-08-30
)). Whether counsel’s performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16027 - 2005-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16