Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 57894 for id.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 828. The defendant has the burden of demonstrating the existence of a new factor. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817415 - 2024-06-26

COURT OF APPEALS
.” However, the transaction in Below occurred in February 2004. Id., ¶8. In a published decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68389 - 2011-07-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
must demonstrate both bias in the PSI writer, id. at 516, and that the sentencing court actually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert J.P.
(5), Stats., in deciding whether to waive its jurisdiction. See id. Additionally, the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11873 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
different.” Id. at 694. In the context of a case resolved by entry of a plea, the prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050844 - 2025-12-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that renders recommitment appeals not moot.” Id., ¶24. In other words, Morales argues that the appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1138200 - 2026-06-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Willison cites language from Allen, id., ¶91, for the proposition that a “sufficient reason” can include
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record, including the previous comments at the first sentencing.’” Id., ¶9 (emphasis in Reynolds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426094 - 2021-09-16

[PDF] State v. Joseph A. Roe
not. Id. at 360, 444 N.W.2d at 435. Rather, the objective facts before the officer need only lead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10637 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
that ambiguity.” Id. at 60. ¶10 Rotzien argues that the deviations within his lane were insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29097 - 2007-05-16