Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23391 - 23400 of 57894 for id.

[PDF] LeRoy Reisch v. David Schwarz
between in- state and out-of-state prisoners for purposes of filing deadlines under the PLRA. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2385 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Husbeck did not respond, he was not required to do so. See id., ¶39. However, the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05

Timothy C. DeWerff v. Cynthia M. DeWerff
in child support proceedings. Id. The doctrine requires a showing of three elements: “(1) [a]ction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5058 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to this case.” However, the transaction in Below occurred in February 2004. Id., ¶8. In a published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68389 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶11 As a preliminary matter, I note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103926 - 2013-11-06

State v. Willie Burnside
is less likely to be a truthful witness than a person who has not been convicted. See id. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13649 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18

State v. Jeffrey Turner
allow him to represent himself. Id. at 204. To establish proper waiver of counsel, the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5777 - 2005-03-31

State v. Troy Petrauski
by the trial court’s decision on that issue. See id. The fundamental focus of the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15618 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth G. Hopkins
. App. 1979). It is the duty of Hopkins to preserve such testimony. See id. Because he has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11962 - 2005-03-31