Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 17421 for Cost.
WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP703 Complete Title of ...
was not a “temporary worker” and that the “employee” exclusion was applicable. B. Costs ¶19 In its responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78512 - 2012-03-27
was not a “temporary worker” and that the “employee” exclusion was applicable. B. Costs ¶19 In its responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78512 - 2012-03-27
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
, the amount of such judgment, interest thereon and costs, and any costs subsequent to such judgment, and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
, the amount of such judgment, interest thereon and costs, and any costs subsequent to such judgment, and any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6160 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Bud’s $47,985 in past damages representing costs Bud’s already incurred to address customer complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06
Bud’s $47,985 in past damages representing costs Bud’s already incurred to address customer complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
costs, bringing the total amount owed to $1803.34. Nierenberger then requested a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
costs, bringing the total amount owed to $1803.34. Nierenberger then requested a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102985 - 2013-10-14
State v. Matthew D.B.
. Matthew objected to the restitution request on the grounds that the personnel costs sought for the school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
. Matthew objected to the restitution request on the grounds that the personnel costs sought for the school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy W. Hunter v. Mark D. Keys
for costs for a frivolous appeal pursuant to RULE 809.25(3), STATS. Because Hunter’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15065 - 2017-09-21
for costs for a frivolous appeal pursuant to RULE 809.25(3), STATS. Because Hunter’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15065 - 2017-09-21
Timothy W. Hunter v. Mark D. Keys
. Defendants have filed a motion for costs for a frivolous appeal pursuant to Rule 809.25(3), Stats. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15065 - 2005-03-31
. Defendants have filed a motion for costs for a frivolous appeal pursuant to Rule 809.25(3), Stats. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patrick McDonough v. Alan J. Muetzelburg
testimony from McDonough’s consultant who estimated the cost of replacing the foundation. The consultant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
testimony from McDonough’s consultant who estimated the cost of replacing the foundation. The consultant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Spring Creek’s buildings at a cost of approximately $256,000. A contract proposal for work on a fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050930 - 2025-12-17
of Spring Creek’s buildings at a cost of approximately $256,000. A contract proposal for work on a fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050930 - 2025-12-17