Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 6253 for cf.

COURT OF APPEALS
, Hart makes no offer of proof on this appeal what proper foundation he would have laid. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70315 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] State v. Eric T. Scott
used toward a sentence of time served for circuit court case no. 00-CF-55, along with what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17896 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. v. James P. Brennan
its discretion in refusing to award additional costs. Cf. Leuch v. Campbell, 250 Wis. 272, 276, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7851 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bernard A. James
. Appeal No. 01-1452-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-97 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31

State v. Albert G. Holman
of the cocaine, but not that he was planning to sell it. Cf. United States v. Hart, 729 F.2d 662, 664 n.5 (10th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31

Brown & Jones Reporting, Inc. v. James P. Brennan
properly exercised its discretion in refusing to award additional costs. Cf. Leuch v. Campbell, 250 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7851 - 2005-03-31

State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
. Appeal No. 01-0931-CR Cir. Ct. No. 91-CF-105 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3808 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eric T. Scott
used toward a sentence of time served for circuit court case no. 00-CF-55, along with what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James M. Smith
as to alone create prejudice. Cf. Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 655-56 (1992) ("excessive delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Central Corporation v. Research Products Corporation
no assets dedicated to serving the brand in question”); cf. Frieburg Farm Equip., Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5499 - 2017-09-19