Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 70054 for hi.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 70054 for hi.
State v. Dennis P. Smith
), as a third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
), as a third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smith claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1r., 946.41(1) and 940.20(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1r., 946.41(1) and 940.20(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
State v. Kevin M. Boon
a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5992 - 2005-03-31
a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
and an order denying his postconviction motion for withdrawal of his Alford plea.[1] Rodriguez contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his postconviction motion for withdrawal of his Alford plea.[1] Rodriguez contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Dwayne Almond, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
. Dwayne Almond, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] We affirm on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117597 - 2014-07-21
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] We affirm on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117597 - 2014-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin M. Boon
), following a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5992 - 2017-09-19
), following a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5992 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
intoxicated prosecution. Shanks argues that the prior conviction was properly excluded because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33857 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated prosecution. Shanks argues that the prior conviction was properly excluded because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33857 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion. Bell sought a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238404 - 2019-04-03
court denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 postconviction motion. Bell sought a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238404 - 2019-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reginald S. Curtis, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Reginald S. Curtis, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21