Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Joshua W.
hearing was defective, that the trial court’s failure to hold trial within twenty days of arraignment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31
hearing was defective, that the trial court’s failure to hold trial within twenty days of arraignment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Grady W. and his wife, Corliss W. On October 9, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136569 - 2017-09-21
of Grady W. and his wife, Corliss W. On October 9, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34357 - 2014-09-15
her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2012, the parties notified the trial court that the matter would proceed to trial as scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104434 - 2017-09-21
, 2012, the parties notified the trial court that the matter would proceed to trial as scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104434 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS proceeding found that Tommy C. was a child in need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136569 - 2015-03-02
, 2012, the trial court presiding over the CHIPS proceeding found that Tommy C. was a child in need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136569 - 2015-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 19, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
, the parties notified the trial court that the matter would proceed to trial as scheduled on July 9, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104434 - 2013-11-18
, the parties notified the trial court that the matter would proceed to trial as scheduled on July 9, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104434 - 2013-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
denying her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20
denying her motion for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court: (1) actually relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34357 - 2008-10-20
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
postconviction motion. Johnson claims that: (1) the trial court erred in accepting his jury waiver on the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11442 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Johnson claims that: (1) the trial court erred in accepting his jury waiver on the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11442 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dion Patton
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his trial counsel’s motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11370 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his trial counsel’s motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11370 - 2005-03-31
Carole B. Miller v. General Motors Corporation
to argue: (1) that the trial court erred by not granting her motion for a new trial on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10879 - 2005-03-31
to argue: (1) that the trial court erred by not granting her motion for a new trial on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10879 - 2005-03-31