Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2341 - 2350 of 7626 for yes.

State v. David A. Chadwick
?" The foreperson answered, "Yes." The record discloses no basis for believing that the jury disregarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10217 - 2005-03-31


[PDF] State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
sent a second question: “If all jury members say yes to, Is this the verdict of the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13888 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Marcia J. Wittig
to an evidentiary chemical test of her blood. She answered yes and submitted to the blood draw, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5525 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
disorder, stated: Yes. She has had periods of time in which she has been grossly psychotic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26342 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Randy D. Purifoy v. Bill Puckett
the erroneous information was supplied by someone else?” The short answer is “yes.” Neither the PRC nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12872 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marcia J. Wittig
blood. She answered yes and submitted to the blood draw, which was conducted in conformity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5525 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
into the parking lot because he felt impaired. Bauman answered “yes” when the deputy asked, “Are you telling me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102037 - 2017-09-21

State v. Alanna J. Kirt
, that if he did not receive a yes or no answer that she would submit to the blood test, he would mark her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12781 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel L Taylor
]: Yes. THE COURT: And you have indicated to me on several occasions that you wish to waive your right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11231 - 2005-03-31