Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 68771 for did.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 68771 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
could watch the younger children if Ruhland did not. However, Ruhland stated that his hours were only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28019 - 2007-02-05
could watch the younger children if Ruhland did not. However, Ruhland stated that his hours were only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28019 - 2007-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismiss the case; the circuit court did so. Green Tree then asked this court to dismiss the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
and dismiss the case; the circuit court did so. Green Tree then asked this court to dismiss the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester M. Hamilton
knowing violation of his bond, and since he did not know that his conduct was disorderly, the bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8468 - 2017-09-19
knowing violation of his bond, and since he did not know that his conduct was disorderly, the bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8468 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cleveland Brown
today, did you have alcohol or illegal drugs? THE DEFENDANT: No, sir. THE COURT: Do you take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
today, did you have alcohol or illegal drugs? THE DEFENDANT: No, sir. THE COURT: Do you take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
found Praxmarer did not suffer pecuniary loss, and Praxmarer does not appeal that finding. Thus, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
found Praxmarer did not suffer pecuniary loss, and Praxmarer does not appeal that finding. Thus, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
[PDF]
Jeffrey D. Berlin v. Lori S. Berlin
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Kevin C. O'Keefe
in June 2000 for noncompliance with continuing legal education requirements. He did not answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16370 - 2017-09-21
in June 2000 for noncompliance with continuing legal education requirements. He did not answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16370 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
chances to continue as a student, and did not know of Amir’s medical problems until after his dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
chances to continue as a student, and did not know of Amir’s medical problems until after his dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
State v. Kerney Wright
involvement in the crime while she was still very upset. When the victim did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10450 - 2005-03-31
involvement in the crime while she was still very upset. When the victim did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas Royster
hearing, the trial court did not mention Detective Durfee's theory in its explanation of Royster's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31
hearing, the trial court did not mention Detective Durfee's theory in its explanation of Royster's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9122 - 2005-03-31