Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 69044 for had.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 69044 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with respect to the CHIPs ground was whether B.T. had failed to meet the conditions in the CHIPs order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
with respect to the CHIPs ground was whether B.T. had failed to meet the conditions in the CHIPs order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
knotted baggies of heroin he had swallowed when he saw police approaching. The total heroin seized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
knotted baggies of heroin he had swallowed when he saw police approaching. The total heroin seized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
Terence T. Bourke, ruled that the State had breached the plea agreement, but further held that the breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
Terence T. Bourke, ruled that the State had breached the plea agreement, but further held that the breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was owed under the agreement. The circuit court concluded that Lambert had satisfied his obligations under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63041 - 2011-04-20
was owed under the agreement. The circuit court concluded that Lambert had satisfied his obligations under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63041 - 2011-04-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In mandamus terms, the Meises argue that the condemnation commission had a clear, plain legal duty to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51817 - 2014-09-15
. In mandamus terms, the Meises argue that the condemnation commission had a clear, plain legal duty to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51817 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald J. Anderson
had a reasonable basis to suspect that Anderson was intoxicated so as to justify detaining him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15470 - 2005-03-31
had a reasonable basis to suspect that Anderson was intoxicated so as to justify detaining him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rickly Wesley v. The City of Milwaukee
. There is no evidence that it was an open and obvious danger, that it is so compelling that the City had to have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11700 - 2017-09-20
. There is no evidence that it was an open and obvious danger, that it is so compelling that the City had to have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11700 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). At sentencing, defense counsel stated that Marshall had just reviewed material that counsel characterized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194109 - 2017-09-21
). At sentencing, defense counsel stated that Marshall had just reviewed material that counsel characterized
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a note for purposes of summary judgment. In Bierbrauer, the court concluded that a bank employee had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92733 - 2014-09-15
a note for purposes of summary judgment. In Bierbrauer, the court concluded that a bank employee had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92733 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lee Crouthers
investigation report noted that Crouthers had a prior criminal record dating back to 1980, including three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2008-11-30
investigation report noted that Crouthers had a prior criminal record dating back to 1980, including three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2008-11-30