Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 67974 for law.
Search results 23421 - 23430 of 67974 for law.
State v. Thomas F. Fetzner
pass statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3806 - 2005-03-31
pass statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3806 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
substantive error; a court may reconsider only to correct an “error of law”; the court’s stated reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
substantive error; a court may reconsider only to correct an “error of law”; the court’s stated reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 28
. However, Becker’s mother predeceased him. No closely related heirs-at-law were living, and extensive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
. However, Becker’s mother predeceased him. No closely related heirs-at-law were living, and extensive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31679 - 2008-03-05
State v. Kevin McCraney
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was unconstitutional because he was not properly advised that one of the charges would be dismissed by operation of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
was unconstitutional because he was not properly advised that one of the charges would be dismissed by operation of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion to suppress, challenging the lawfulness of his detention. The circuit court denied Vogt’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13
a motion to suppress, challenging the lawfulness of his detention. The circuit court denied Vogt’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the question of whether the stop was lawful on the grounds that the sergeant observed Troka violate WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
the question of whether the stop was lawful on the grounds that the sergeant observed Troka violate WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Stauffenecker received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2007-05-29
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Stauffenecker received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2007-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
: Walter E. Zimmerman, Appellant, v. Charles I. Phillips, Law Offices of Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88857 - 2012-10-31
: Walter E. Zimmerman, Appellant, v. Charles I. Phillips, Law Offices of Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88857 - 2012-10-31
State v. Tommie Thames
. “The sufficiency of a criminal complaint is a question of law, which we independently review.” State v. Kordas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2005-03-31
. “The sufficiency of a criminal complaint is a question of law, which we independently review.” State v. Kordas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10041 - 2005-03-31