Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 29823 for des.
James N. Elliott v. Michael L. Morgan
is de novo. See id. The statute at issue in this case is § 66.293(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See id. The statute at issue in this case is § 66.293(3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Edson
cases were multiplicitous. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
cases were multiplicitous. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Shea
, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis.2d 973, 978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12880 - 2017-09-21
, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis.2d 973, 978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A.L.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10242 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10242 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas B. Brulport
review de novo. State v. Mattes, 175 Wis.2d 572, 578, 499 N.W.2d 711, 713 (Ct. App. 1993). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9228 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Mattes, 175 Wis.2d 572, 578, 499 N.W.2d 711, 713 (Ct. App. 1993). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2015-16) is a question of law that we review de novo. 2 State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211010 - 2018-04-12
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.155 (2015-16) is a question of law that we review de novo. 2 State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211010 - 2018-04-12
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116190 - 2014-07-07
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116190 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See id. ¶22 Our review of a circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See id. ¶22 Our review of a circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
WI APP 26
de novo review. Teschendorf, 293 Wis. 2d 123, ¶9. In statutory interpretation, the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91596 - 2017-09-21
de novo review. Teschendorf, 293 Wis. 2d 123, ¶9. In statutory interpretation, the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91596 - 2017-09-21
WI App 31 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP827-CR Complete Title ...
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137612 - 2015-04-28
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137612 - 2015-04-28