Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 57894 for id.

State v. Jonathan Moen
of similar cases subsequently to flow by unaffected by that new rule.” Id., 479 U.S. at 323 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14943 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶11 As a preliminary matter, I note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103926 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Eric L. Hansen
his confession, it was reasonably probable that the trial court would have done so. See id. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10578 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Constitution. Id. “The fundamental nature of the right to testify means that it is not subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594462 - 2022-11-23

State v. Byron A. Anderson
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 797-98. ¶5 An arrest occurs when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the facts of record. Id. The voluntariness of a decision to reduce income is a question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90909 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the caller ID displayed the call as “unavailable,” but she recognized his voice. ¶3 Hitchon further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53086 - 2010-08-09

[PDF] Bertie G. Tolley v. Barbara E. Tolley
§ 767.255, STATS. Id. at 783-84, 407 N.W.2d at 234-35. However, the court further held that the usual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13585 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph A. Roe
not. Id. at 360, 444 N.W.2d at 435. Rather, the objective facts before the officer need only lead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10637 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court must “consider youth as a mitigating factor.” Id. at 1316. The Court in Jones concluded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09