Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 57351 for id.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or ruled upon. See id. No. 2021AP868 7 I. Substantial change of circumstances ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579787 - 2022-10-18
or ruled upon. See id. No. 2021AP868 7 I. Substantial change of circumstances ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579787 - 2022-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for our review as “[d]id Waukesha County meet its burden to establish that [Martin] is a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
for our review as “[d]id Waukesha County meet its burden to establish that [Martin] is a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699402 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment. Id. Application to C.K.S.’s Appeal ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment. Id. Application to C.K.S.’s Appeal ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456986 - 2021-11-30
[PDF]
WI APP 231
has the right to assistance of counsel for his or her defense. Id. at 2561. The Court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30168 - 2014-09-15
has the right to assistance of counsel for his or her defense. Id. at 2561. The Court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joan A. German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
in interpreting a statute is to discern the intent of the legislature. Id. Analysis ¶8 We first resolve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17356 - 2017-09-21
in interpreting a statute is to discern the intent of the legislature. Id. Analysis ¶8 We first resolve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17356 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. at 687. To satisfy the prejudice prong, defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
.” Id. at 687. To satisfy the prejudice prong, defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
WI APP 89
577 (1997). The question presented on review is one of constitutional fact. Id. at 140. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32806 - 2014-09-15
577 (1997). The question presented on review is one of constitutional fact. Id. at 140. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the statutory standard the court will apply at the second stage.” Id. The statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635054 - 2023-03-21
of the statutory standard the court will apply at the second stage.” Id. The statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635054 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 59
to as a writ of error coram nobis. See id. at 212. Throughout this opinion, we refer to it as a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217538 - 2018-10-11
to as a writ of error coram nobis. See id. at 212. Throughout this opinion, we refer to it as a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217538 - 2018-10-11