Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
from the number of jurors. We see no compelling reason to review Harvey’s constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
from the number of jurors. We see no compelling reason to review Harvey’s constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Hassel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07
in the no-merit report that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Hassel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Randy R. Mertz
conclude that Mertz’s claims are without merit. INFORMING THE ACCUSED FORM Mertz was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
conclude that Mertz’s claims are without merit. INFORMING THE ACCUSED FORM Mertz was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
message he exchanged with the victim after the assault. He claims these messages were “apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68987 - 2011-08-01
message he exchanged with the victim after the assault. He claims these messages were “apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68987 - 2011-08-01
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238787 - 2019-04-05
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238787 - 2019-04-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” On March 2, 2023, Asher filed a claim for legal services showing that each party still owed her $1,722.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
.” On March 2, 2023, Asher filed a claim for legal services showing that each party still owed her $1,722.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033907 - 2025-11-11
John Novak v. Antoinette Clothier
the proposed answers and granted a default judgment on the adverse possession claim. The trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14393 - 2005-03-31
the proposed answers and granted a default judgment on the adverse possession claim. The trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14393 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied the motion after a Machner[2] hearing. Kafer appeals. ¶4 To prevail on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92944 - 2013-02-19
denied the motion after a Machner[2] hearing. Kafer appeals. ¶4 To prevail on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92944 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
Gary Martin Krutke v. Jodi Ann Krutke
to Dougherty so that the issue could be reviewed in 2000. Dougherty claims that Krutke never supplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19
to Dougherty so that the issue could be reviewed in 2000. Dougherty claims that Krutke never supplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7602 - 2017-09-19