Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23451 - 23460 of 30245 for de.
Search results 23451 - 23460 of 30245 for de.
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168305 - 2017-09-21
. A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion alleges sufficient facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Allen, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194666 - 2017-09-21
the motion alleges sufficient facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Allen, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Laurie A. Koch
, 227 Wis. 2d 167, 205, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15560 - 2017-09-21
, 227 Wis. 2d 167, 205, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerome J. Miezin v. Midwest Express Airlines, Inc.
judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18147 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material and non-conclusory facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640834 - 2023-04-04
de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material and non-conclusory facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640834 - 2023-04-04
State v. Scott Heimermann
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Conserve summary judgment. Culver now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a summary judgment ruling de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56840 - 2010-11-15
Conserve summary judgment. Culver now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a summary judgment ruling de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56840 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
Robert G. Fish v. Margaret W. Fish
a question of law that we decide No. 94-2345 -3- de novo, without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8082 - 2017-09-19
a question of law that we decide No. 94-2345 -3- de novo, without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights is a question this court reviews de novo. See Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶20 Gabler argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644939 - 2023-04-19
rights is a question this court reviews de novo. See Coffee, 389 Wis. 2d 627, ¶17. ¶20 Gabler argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644939 - 2023-04-19